نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The present paper analyzes the theoretical foundations of popular participation in the political structure from the perspective of Farabi (Avennasar) and Mulla Sadra, these great Islamic philosophers. Although both thinkers have accepted the ideal government as a manifestation of justice and virtue, the main question is whether they share the same view regarding the type of people's role in producing the ideal political system. The research has been conducted using a descriptive-analytical method and library resources. The scientific achievement of this paper shows that in Farabi's thought, people are a part of the system of the virtuous city (Madina al-Fāḍila), and their participation finds meaning under the guidance of intellect and the leadership of wise rulers. In contrast, Mulla Sadra, by emphasizing the substantial motion (al-ḥaraka al-jawhariyya) of humans, sees the people's role as more dynamic and intrinsic in establishing a worthy government and considers legitimacy, in addition to its divine basis, to be contingent upon social acceptance. The conclusion of the research is that Farabi emphasizes rational order and elitism, while Mulla Sadra emphasizes the spiritual and social connection of the people with the government. Therefore, by combining the views of these two intellectuals, a more comprehensive model for an acceptable Islamic government based on intellect, justice, and popular consent can be presented.
کلیدواژهها English
