The question of existence over nature is the basis of Sinaitic theology; Avicenna's view of the question of existence over nature has influenced Sinaitic theology. In this article, the impact of this view on Sheikh al-Raisi's image of the Sinaitic argument is of interest. Our research method is descriptive analysis. The aim of the article is to show how Ibn Sina's view of the question of existence over nature has influenced Sinaitic argument; in the premises of the argument, the division of beings into necessary and possible, the question of causality and other premises, there are direct and sometimes indirect traces of the Sheikh's view of the question of existence over nature. One of the important results of this research is that, given the Sheikh's interpretation of the question of existence over nature and Ibn Sina's attention to the context of the real world, we can find the characteristics of the Siddiqin argument in it.

We will show that the proof is a pseudo-Lemma, given its many differences with existing versions. It is argued from the truth of existence, not the concept of existence. The premises of the transformation of space and continuity are not needed here, and the concept